Country risk profile · Global Slavery Index 2023

Forced labour risk in Portugal

This profile describes structural risk conditions for companies sourcing from Portugal. It says nothing about any individual supplier, and a high structural risk score is not an allegation that forced labour has occurred anywhere in your chain.

Estimated prevalence

3.8

people per 1,000 population estimated to be living in modern slavery (2021 reference year)

Prevalence rank

114 / 160

where 1 is the highest estimated prevalence in the index

Government response

67%

Comparatively strong government response

ILO Protocol P029

Protocol of 2014 to the Forced Labour Convention, where recorded in our dataset

What the state response means for a buyer

Walk Free assesses the state response as comparatively strong. A stronger response lowers, but does not remove, the structural risk a buyer should plan for.

In the Libera score, this tier adds 0 points of response gap on top of the prevalence component. The full weighting is published on the methodology page.

Import measures and sanctions recorded

No forced-labour import measure is recorded against Portugal in our dataset. That is not a clearance: measures target entities and goods as well as countries, and Libera screens every supplier name against live sanctions and import-ban lists at the time of the check.

Screening covers OFAC sanctions data and the DHS UFLPA Entity List, fetched when a supplier is screened. How UFLPA screening works.

Risk is not proof

Country data describes structural conditions across an economy. It cannot tell you what is happening at one site this month, and it is never a finding about a supplier. In Libera, country risk sets the baseline; what changes a supplier's status is what is actually observed — live list matches, and confidential signals from the people doing the work.

Prevalence and government response figures are from the Global Slavery Index 2023, a static edition with a 2021 reference year. They are not updated in real time.

Other country profiles

Sources