SYNTHETIC DEMO — fictional construction group. All companies, sites, subcontracting links, cases and figures are invented. No real tenant data.
Three fictional sites, 300 direct workers, 40 fictional suppliers and subcontractors.
Missing data widens the score range; the cautious end is shown, so gaps never lower risk. Indicators are not findings.
| Supplier | Tier | Country | Score (range) | Uncertainty | Top factor | Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formwork Co. 01 (fictional) | 1 | Netherlands | 29 (29–29) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Rebar Co. 02 (fictional) | 1 | Netherlands | 29 (29–29) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Scaffolding Co. 03 (fictional) | 1 | Portugal | 21 (21–21) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 14/25 | — |
| Facade Co. 04 (fictional) | 1 | Germany | 47 (29–47) | high | Operating model 23/23 | Human review |
| Electrical Co. 05 (fictional) | 1 | Turkey | 49 (42–49) | medium | Operating model 23/23 | — |
| Plumbing Co. 06 (fictional) | 1 | Turkey | 54 (42–54) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Labour agency Co. 07 (fictional) | 1 | Nepal | 43 (32–43) | medium | Operating model 20/23 | — |
| Haulage Co. 08 (fictional) | 1 | Romania | 56 (49–56) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Steel supply Co. 09 (fictional) | 1 | Ukraine | 52 (41–52) | medium | Country prevalence 23/35 | — |
| Cleaning Co. 10 (fictional) | 1 | Nepal | 37 (37–37) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Aggregate supply Co. 11 (fictional) | 1 | Romania | 41 (41–41) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Drywall Co. 12 (fictional) | 1 | Bulgaria | 38 (38–38) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Roofing Co. 13 (fictional) | 1 | Turkey | 36 (36–36) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Security Co. 14 (fictional) | 1 | Nepal | 30 (30–30) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Formwork Co. 15 (fictional) | 1 | Poland | 56 (56–56) | low | Country prevalence 15/35 | — |
| Rebar Co. 16 (fictional) | 1 | Portugal | 26 (26–26) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Scaffolding Co. 17 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 29 (29–29) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Facade Co. 18 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 37 (37–37) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 17/25 | — |
| Electrical Co. 19 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 42 (42–42) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Plumbing Co. 20 (fictional) | 2 | India | 46 (46–46) | low | Country prevalence 18/35 | — |
| Labour agency Co. 21 (fictional) | 2 | Turkey | 43 (36–43) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Haulage Co. 22 (fictional) | 2 | Nepal | 42 (30–42) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | Human review |
| Steel supply Co. 23 (fictional) | 2 | Bulgaria | 49 (49–49) | low | Operating model 20/23 | — |
| Cleaning Co. 24 (fictional) | 2 | Turkey | 56 (49–56) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Aggregate supply Co. 25 (fictional) | 2 | Romania | 56 (49–56) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Drywall Co. 26 (fictional) | 2 | Ukraine | 39 (39–39) | low | Country prevalence 23/35 | — |
| Roofing Co. 27 (fictional) | 2 | Bulgaria | 47 (47–47) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Security Co. 28 (fictional) | 2 | Poland | 50 (50–50) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Formwork Co. 29 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 40 (40–40) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Rebar Co. 30 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 30 (30–30) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Scaffolding Co. 31 (fictional) | 2 | Netherlands | 36 (29–36) | medium | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Facade Co. 32 (fictional) | 2 | Nepal | 36 (36–36) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 14/25 | — |
| Electrical Co. 33 (fictional) | 2 | Netherlands | 46 (46–46) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 23/25 | — |
| Plumbing Co. 34 (fictional) | 2 | Portugal | 26 (26–26) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Labour agency Co. 35 (fictional) | 2 | Germany | 47 (40–47) | medium | Operating model 23/23 | — |
| Haulage Co. 36 (fictional) | 2 | Portugal | 21 (21–21) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 14/25 | — |
| Steel supply Co. 37 (fictional) | 2 | Nepal | 30 (30–30) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
| Cleaning Co. 38 (fictional) | 2 | Poland | 56 (56–56) | low | Country prevalence 15/35 | — |
| Aggregate supply Co. 39 (fictional) | 2 | Turkey | 33 (33–33) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 17/25 | — |
| Drywall Co. 40 (fictional) | 2 | Netherlands | 29 (29–29) | low | Sector exploitation intensity 21/25 | — |
Every link below is invented demo data. Libera does not infer real-world relationships; a real graph needs relationships you record.
Triage: Priority review; no contact with site management while retaliation risk open.
Actions: Fee reimbursement plan (verified); Direct-hire transition for affected roles (completed)
Computing provenance…
Triage: Escalated to sensitive reviewer; worker safety guidance shared via receipt channel only.
Actions: Return of identity documents (in_progress)
Computing provenance…
Triage: Single signal — monitor; insufficient to conclude anything.
Actions: none yet
Computing provenance…
Triage: Request accommodation inspection; screening data incomplete.
Actions: Independent accommodation inspection (completed)
Computing provenance…
Tamper-evident, not tamper-proof: SHA-256 hash chain over stored events. It is not a qualified electronic timestamp, signature or legal certification of evidence.
